RE: Strong and Weak Arguments
January 10, 2017 at 7:45 am
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2017 at 8:29 am by Mr Greene.)
It does presuppose that the values could have deviated from what they are, and that Carbon based life is more important to the 'Tuner' than Silicon based life.
Indeed the SAP is being proven false by the observation of Extra-solar planetary systems. Part of the SAP states that the Age of the Universe is a factor, to within a few million years, however the existence of other planetary systems far older than our own demonstrates that the particular age of the Universe is not a requirement.
That leaves the 'Cosmological Constant' and the mass of a proton...
I'm having a hard time not seeing this as blatant Woo with no more credibility than ID.
Indeed the SAP is being proven false by the observation of Extra-solar planetary systems. Part of the SAP states that the Age of the Universe is a factor, to within a few million years, however the existence of other planetary systems far older than our own demonstrates that the particular age of the Universe is not a requirement.
That leaves the 'Cosmological Constant' and the mass of a proton...
I'm having a hard time not seeing this as blatant Woo with no more credibility than ID.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?-Esquilax
Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.