Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement.

[Drich]

m


Drich,

In reference to your post within this thread, #92.



YOUR MISINTERPRETATION OF WHAT I SAID QUOTE:  "Reallyy?!?!? then please explain (book chapter and verse) the reasons one 
must have to attend church.."

ICON’S REFUTATION:  Uh, I didn’t say you had to attend your “division” of a church, I said that since you went, you went 
for the wrong reason. Get it?

Glob...
Yes I get it, let pretent I got it the first time and now frame my quote around the idea I got it.. Kinda changes what I'm asking doesn't it?

I am asking what reasons (IF NOT CHASING CHICKS) is a legitimate reason to be in church. Then I asked for book chapter and verse. that is essentially me asking for a command or a rule that says here are the reasons one must attend.

Now the question is, do you 'get it?'

I am sure your serial killing Jesus would agree that you're not to go to church to pick up "hot chicks!"

Then please explain why He sent so much time talking to and eating with the dregs of his society rather than they 'holy and chase?'

In any event, to appease your blatant biblical ignorance, I will answer your question where it is better for the inept pseudo-christian like you 
to attend your “division” of a church:

"Praise the Lord! Praise God in his sanctuary; praise him in his mighty heavens! Praise him for his mighty deeds; praise him according to 
his excellent greatness! Praise him with trumpet sound; praise him with lute and harp! Praise him with tambourine and dance; praise him 
ith strings and pipe! Praise him with sounding cymbals; praise him with loud clashing cymbals!” (Psalm 150: 1-6)

(Sporty here doesn't know the difference between a command and a psalm.)

Oh great teacher doth thou really make such a critical mistake or is this a test?

I hope to come to you soon, but I am writing these things to you so that, if I delay, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, 
which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth.” (1 Timothy 3: 14-15)

Oh, noes! great teacher, it seem you do not understand simple context either...
1 Tim 3 is about establishing and qualifying leadership with in the church, it says nothing about who is allowed in and why.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se...imothy%203

what else you got?

Can it trump 3 of a kind?
Meaning in three of the 4 Gospels Jesus Himself is recorded in saying:
Mark 2:17, mat 9:12, Luke 5:31
All three say the same thing. From luke:
29 Then Levi gave a big dinner at his house for Jesus. At the table there were many tax collectors and some other people too. 30 But the Pharisees and those who taught the law for the Pharisees began to complain to the followers of Jesus, “Why do you eat and drink with tax collectors and other sinners?”

31 Jesus answered them, “It is the sick people who need a doctor, not those who are healthy. 32 I have not come to ask good people to change. I have come to ask sinners to change the way they live.”

Ever heard the expression "Christ's Church is a Hospital for the sinners, not a hall of fame of saints." It comes from these passages. Why? because there is no salvation for people who do not think they needed it. Only those who know they are in sin. Someone like one who goes to church looking to hook up with a hot chick afterwards.

If you need anymore passages concerning your ignorance on this topic, or any other, let me know, I’ll add more embarrassing egg upon your face, okay?

yes please.

YOUR VERY REVEALING QUOTE OF PEEING IN YOUR PANTS:
[b]ICON’S REFUTATION:  Wow, already acquiescing and trying in vain to lay the groundwork of why I am not suppose to debate you on whether the 
preponderance of the existing evidence shows that the BIBLE Jesus did not exist? Already looking for excuses to RUN?! 



In simple terms so your inept pseudo-christian mind can understand, in your presumed past of coming out of discussions with Atheists unscathed is moot, 
that was the past, and this is now, and you have yet to debate me on this specific topic, or any other pseudo-christian topics, understood?  

just bring it already.

There is no threats, because your biblical and historical ignorance along with your pseudo-christian insidious apologetic spin will be shown at your expense. 
I am trying to get the moderators to give us a thread of our own so no sideline nibblers will be present, of which will help show you to be one of the most 
ignorant of any pseudo-christian within this forum, get it?

Stimbo already laid it out for you retard, it's not going to happen your way. just poop out you friggen argument already so I can cut it up and force feed it back to you line by line like I did the OP.

I can see already that I will be using a “spell check” for your wanting refutations, of which, you take the cake is misspellings, which is subjectively worse 
than any color of font that I will be using to make your ignorance and stupidity stand out.

what are you Asian? is English your second language? how do you not understand your bluff is being called.. it's time to show what you have. Talkie time is over. How about you find or message me when you get done transcribing/plagiarizing whatever youtube video you are trying to draw your argument from, and finally post it.

Of notice, you're really ignorant relative to your primitive Bronze and Iron Age cultist Christian faith as has been shown ad infinitum within just
our discussions.  I'll try and give you some slack because of this fact, okay?  You can thank me at that time.

holy crap someone please come get me when this troll posts something of substance.. Even if it is just more misuse of scripture.. Something I can legit beat him with. I'm done with this verbal D* measuring contest if he is not willing to be sized up.