RE: Do religions represent God?
January 16, 2017 at 12:16 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2017 at 12:17 pm by Whateverist.)
(January 14, 2017 at 12:44 pm)Little Rik Wrote:(January 13, 2017 at 11:36 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: Explain why it doesn't make sense please.
I and a lot of other people have evidence that God exist but there is a but.
The but is that God is felt within and is not transferable to other.
You conquer God and God belong to you.
Is like when you are in love with someone.
Would you want any third party in the middle?
But as I already said to other in this forum even if you would want someone else between
you and God that wouldn't be possible.
God reward only those who try.
So this way to give evidence that God exist is not on even if by looking at the pineal gland purity
it would be possible to understand someone closeness to God.
In the past the saints were represented with an aureola on top of the head around the pineal gland
but the personal experiences with God are just personal so let them be personal.
Today thanks to easy communications we can see hundreds of people who had an NDE experience.
Not that in the past people did not have these experiences.
They also had in the past but because there was not easy communication and because there was
the thread to be taken as mad people their experiences stay hidden.
Now coming to your question why it does not make sense what you say.
You reckon that................An NDE would be evidence for god if all other contending ideas/explanations could be ruled out and that would be the only explanation remaining, so far that isn't the case. So claiming it as a clear evidence of god is quite dishonest.......
Why there would be the need to rule out all other explanations to see that the NDEs are real?
As I already said in the previous post the ways to God are infinite.
I have evidence that God exist because I feel him within.
There are infinite ways to realize that God exist not just one.
There are infinite ways to get to Rome.
Why there should be only one way?
That is why your idea that we should rule out ............ all other contending ideas/explanations.......is faulty.
So basically your argument here is premised on the assumption that none of us will tackle a wall of shit this high. The argument is a good one, it just doesn't address Aoi's request.