RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 7:06 am
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 7:08 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 18, 2017 at 6:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Happy to. It indicates a conflict in your loopy worldview. You're constantly railing that nothing is perfectly observable, yet you claim that the silliness of my signature is observable.
You may now proceed with your nutty double talk in a futile effort to get yourself out of this predicament.
Boru the Silly
So, it is as predicted.
Here is a meme that fits your behaviour:
Simply, anyway, as I stated prior, I had not stated that your duplicate signature was absolutely silly, but instead, that it was silly.
You appeared to ignore my prior post, so here it is once more:
ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:Something to keep in mind:
NOWHERE DID I STATE THAT THE OBSERVATION OF YOUR REDUNDANT SIGNATURE WAS OF ABSOLUTE NATURE.
As I prior stated, life appears to persist in the domain of probabilities.
Furthermore, recall that probabilities don't necessarily imply nonsense.
Probabilities are observed to give rise to life, and the sequences of particles of computers that comprise your post are demonstrably of probabilistic nature.