RE: Do you think American soldiers are put on too high of a pedestal
January 18, 2017 at 6:29 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 6:30 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(January 18, 2017 at 5:41 pm)abaris Wrote: CL, read what the early church fathers like Tertullian had to say on war, Capital Punishment or military service. Only with the Constantinian buttkissing contest of 313 they performed a complete turnaround. But one of the reasons why the church lost all credit with me.
I'm glad we've learned from the mistakes made hundreds to thousands of years ago.
(January 18, 2017 at 5:50 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(January 18, 2017 at 2:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Erm...I wouldn't call things like rules of engagement or limits to what the military can do as being 'politically correct.'
In that war, target lists were developed that made no military sense -- for instance, we couldn't attack shipping bringing replenishment SA-2 missiles into Haiphong, but on the target lists were sites where the batteries were operational. The best place to defeat any weapon is in the supply chain, before it may be brought to bear on your soldiers, airmen, and sailors.
That targeting decision was politically motivated, as a result of the policy of gradual escalation, and dictated from DC. It's an easy priority to establish when it ain't your ass flying into a barrage of SAMs and 23-mm fire.
Exactly.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh