RE: [4.1 SECOND Conversion] (without weird fonts too!)
January 18, 2017 at 8:13 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 8:15 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(January 18, 2017 at 8:09 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(January 18, 2017 at 7:54 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
As a 'distinguished writer', it appears you have failed to utter any sensible sequences.
Simply, silly may be a synonym for wasteful.
It is scientifically demonstrable, that there are two instances of 'boru'.
On two occasions now you've, by use of quotes, insinuated that I think of myself as "distinguished" or a "genius". Neither is the case; I'm well aware of both my intellectual limitations and my obscurity.
Unlike you.
My point was that your misuse of the language (deliberate or inadvertent) in order to push your point should warn the reader that you are either aware of your sloppy thinking and seeking to cover it up, or are uneducated enough in basic English communication that your points are perhaps vapid.
It's not about me, brotha -- it's about you ... for better or worse.
I maintain that silly may be a synonym for wasteful.
So, no 'misuse' there, Mr "Writer".
Ps: You could probably have avoided embarrassment, had you taken a quick look in a dictionary.