(January 31, 2017 at 6:36 pm)Drich Wrote: essentily 100 years is being way generous. 1950 is when we seriously started identified and started accurate recording the data points we now use. The fact that you think any different, and chose to speak without checking MAKES the moron I said you where.
http://history.aip.org/climate/solar.htm
The link above is a complete history of science surrounding climate change. While I do not support it's final conclusion as the article does not take into consideration the data points that would ultimately affect climate rendered by a "3d huluhoop effect the earth's orbit would have in conjunction with solar output, I believe the article does indeed correctly follow how climate change via green house gas verse solar sunspots cycles would have..
Again, I am saying solar out put in conjunction with orbit over century long cycles determines climate (As did the last 500 years of science) this article maps out sunspots effect out a particular type of solar output/cosmic rays. But the article does accurately describe how and when our knowledge of climate change data was and is gathered.
So 1950 sport that means with 67 years of data youre people claim the sky is falling, and because I am not in a panic makes me the less credible??!?! Again the Sky is falling junk started in the late 90's AND inorder for to believe this bunk you have to ignore over 500 years of solar science and observation, even several mini Iceages with in the last 3 or 400 years, all of which is completely contrary to what your sky is falling doctrine tells you...
You know what you douche bags had you go for the last 10 years or so. give it a rest and let the adults run the world again. Maybe next time you all can do something with aliens or 'alien credits.' Some special tax that will help those who pay it avoid being probed
Lol, yeah, it's not like we can't dig into the layers of ice in the Antarctic to test the composition of the atmosphere and temperature of the earth for the last several thousands of years. If everyone stayed as stupid as you, we'd still have lead in our gasoline.
So, while we have only been studying the climate for decades now, we actually have data about the climate for thousands of years. How do you think we know about all of those ice ages and stuff, ya fuckin' tool?
Sure, it's just a natural warming from sunspots and the orbit. It all just coincidentally started when we started burning fossil fuels. Once again, the proven-to-be retarded, ignorant internet crusader knows more than 99% of the people with degrees in the field.

Tell me, what's it like to feel so superior when you're actually so goddamn stupid? It's just really hard for me to imagine someone someone with your level of self-awareness.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell