RE: Guys do you believe Howard Storm's NDE?
February 4, 2017 at 1:47 pm
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2017 at 2:14 pm by Angrboda.)
(February 4, 2017 at 8:33 am)Little Rik Wrote:(February 3, 2017 at 12:56 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: This is just another one of your moronic setups so that you can blab and blab and blab. Not falling for it.
Evidence or GTFO.
You are an absolute joke yog.
You ask me for evidence but when I do ask you the same you twist the game to a different direction.
I did asked you what is the difference between an NDE and an hallucination. NO ANSWER. [here]
I did asked you to give evidence that the consciousness is a product of the brain. NO ANSWER [here]
I did asked you to give evidence that physical science is able to understand consciousness. NO ANSWER [never asked]
I did asked you to give evidence that a brain under stress can put together an NDE. NO answer. [never asked; here]
And yet you say that I provided "piles of information". Which is it, Rik, NO ANSWER or "piles of information"? You can't even keep your lies straight.
Not only is this a bunch of distracting bullshit, it's not even true. I have several times given evidence that consciousness is a product of the brain. You just suck at listening. So here we see you lying again. Like I said, your question was just a pretext for a bullshit answer. And here we see you claiming to have asked questions and got no answer. It's bullshit. You got your answers, you just want to play games about who isn't answering questions.
Well my question has remained the same throughout: Do you have evidence that NDEs occur when the brain is completely shut down? NO ANSWER.
Regardless, you're the one that claims that NDEs are proof of afterlife and I've debunked all your "proof." That's my answer to your nonsense.
(February 4, 2017 at 8:33 am)Little Rik Wrote: You don't fool me yog.
All you can fool are those fools that think that you are smart by producing piles and piles of informations
put together by some mental masturbators that fool themselves thinking that they can understand consciousness using physical science knowledge.
Piles of information? It's called "evidence." I can understand why you're not familiar with the term, seeing that you never provide any.