RE: As smart as Min is, he is going to leave because he realized they wouldn't listen.
February 6, 2017 at 2:26 pm
(This post was last modified: February 6, 2017 at 2:26 pm by Whateverist.)
(February 6, 2017 at 2:20 pm)abaris Wrote:(February 6, 2017 at 2:15 pm)Whateverist Wrote: I tend to be on the side of honoring their contribution by giving them the leeway they request even though it does feel like nannying.
Well, how about titles like that.
Thread #247 (your own, I know)
Or: Can I just say, and I'm just being honest...
Should we report them or just let them be? I can't imagine anyone being as trivial as that. But that's just me. In my mind the bureaucracy can reach levels where it's overregulating the regulations.
I get that staff want the rules because they don't want to be making decisions on their guts alone and wish to safe guard against abuse, intended or not. And that is a worthy consideration. But the longer the specific list of offenses becomes it seems that it must also complexify their jogs too. At least I'd feel it did in their shoes. Perhaps something like this is better left in the same category as the "no sex with dead threads" 'rule'? Everyone tut tuts, but in the end .. meh.
