(February 21, 2017 at 2:40 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(February 20, 2017 at 11:55 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I'm side eyeing you right now Thump...
It's all good, Hugs, ain't everyone going to agree with me all the time.
(February 21, 2017 at 12:01 am)paulpablo Wrote: So the conclusive proof that we have is based on what RobertE said and what Bella didn't say.
When you link the post where I call it "conclusive proof", you might have a point. Until then, you're simply being your usual, obtuse self ... and I'm having my usual laugh at you trying to rile me.
Thump I'm not trying to rile you.
You didn't say it was conclusive proof so admittedly I slightly misspoke about the words you used.
What you said was..
Quote:Immediately after I posted a rebuttal to her claim that she'd never mentioned BNP showing conclusively that she had, she posted in CIJS that she was tired of all this crap ... and that's the last I read of her.
"Ragequit" is, to be fair, probably inaccurate. Perhaps "shamequit" is a better fit.
conclusively means in a decisive way in effect proving the case.
Your rebuttal (as far as I'm aware and I'm genuinely saying I could be totally wrong about this) was the post that RobertE made.
So in my opinion that doesn't constitute conclusive evidence that Bella had mentioned the BNP to RobertE. It just shows that he said she did. Conclusive would be if she had posted in in public.
Unless there's some other post I'm not aware of.
To put it simply I don't see it as conclusive that Bella did send something to RobertE if it's purely based on what RobertE is saying.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
