(February 21, 2017 at 2:55 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(February 21, 2017 at 2:37 am)paulpablo Wrote: I explained the context last time but it went over your head.As for your position on owning slaves, after it was pointed out that your context was bs, you backpedaled hard, why did you backpedal if there was no controversy? Go ahead and challenge me on that if you want, I have no problems pulling receipts.
I'm telling you that in both situations there was no controversy in what I was saying. But because I don't think you'll be able to comprehend it would be a waste of time to explain to you.
The second example is more complex than the first, so if you can't understand the first you wouldn't understand the second.
As for "cops are justified in beating up black people.", I'm trying to legitimately give you a chance to explain yourself, so again provide the context you're speaking of.
All I can see is you saying you didn't understand then, you don't understand now, and you definitely won't understand anything from this point onwards.
You're not even on the radar huggy.
A fun fact is that thump is giving you kudos now for saying that what I said about slavery was bullshit but actually gave me kudos at the time for my explanation about context. Think what you want about that.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
