(March 4, 2017 at 3:02 am)Jesster Wrote:(March 4, 2017 at 2:53 am)bennyboy Wrote: 1. Things in reality ARE both "A" and "not A" at the same time. That's the essence of QM superposition.
2. Consciousness.
I see no reason why you couldn't view normal morality as either subjective or as objective. If I develop a moral idea, and you watch me doing it equipped with an fMRI or whatever, then it's a matter of chosen perspective, not of establishing that it must be one or the other.
This is not quantum mechanics, which is something I can't even begin to make any educated assertions about and I doubt you can either. This is a plain logical negation argument, which you are blatantly violating. Do you understand the basis of logic?
I don't care too much which side of the subjective/objective argument you are going for (although I have my own opinion about that). Just at least pick one.
I drink hot chocolate. I experience what the hot chocolate is like. My brain is doing stuff, which is physical stuff, and the physical process can (to a degree) be observed-- there's brain activity happening. So it's both subjective and objective.
