Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?

Hello There, Guest! (Lost Password?) Register

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: July 27, 2025, 10:24 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?

Jehanne

Away

Senior Member

Religious Views: n/a

Posts: 7259
Threads: 506
Joined: December 12, 2015
Reputation: 22

#1

Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?

March 4, 2017 at 6:38 am

Has basic Science now ended? In other words, are QED (Quantum Electrodynamics), QCD and General Relativity basically complete theories and there really is no hope of anything beyond those? Or, will String Theory, M Theory, or some successor theory unite all theories into something even greater, something that leads to testable predictions? Or, as Sean Carroll says, does it even matter:

[Image: Everyday-Equation.jpg]

[Image: Everyday-Equation.jpg]

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 6:38 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - March 4, 2017 at 7:35 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 7:36 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - March 4, 2017 at 7:39 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 7:52 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 8:44 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Cyberman - March 4, 2017 at 7:44 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 9:11 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 9:24 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 9:35 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 10:44 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by bennyboy - March 4, 2017 at 9:43 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 9:51 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 11:09 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 2:24 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by vorlon13 - March 4, 2017 at 12:43 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 12:52 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ErGingerbreadMandude - March 4, 2017 at 1:27 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by vorlon13 - March 4, 2017 at 4:17 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 5:58 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ignoramus - March 4, 2017 at 6:48 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Fireball - March 4, 2017 at 7:29 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 9:03 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 5, 2017 at 2:21 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ignoramus - March 4, 2017 at 7:42 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ignoramus - March 4, 2017 at 8:52 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Mr Greene - March 5, 2017 at 5:16 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 5, 2017 at 11:36 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by henryy123 - April 10, 2017 at 3:08 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by brewer - April 10, 2017 at 7:54 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Brian37 - April 10, 2017 at 8:11 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by dyresand - April 10, 2017 at 11:14 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	What does God have in common with String Theory?	LinuxGal	2	1332	December 30, 2022 at 1:45 pm Last Post: Anomalocaris
	What are Laws of Nature?	vulcanlogician	63	9040	March 23, 2022 at 9:15 am Last Post: Rahn127
	Physics Puzzle	onlinebiker	32	4073	July 21, 2020 at 4:07 am Last Post: zebo-the-fat
	Physics questions	ignoramus	21	3523	May 9, 2019 at 6:27 pm Last Post: Anomalocaris
	What Does Gravity Have To Do WithThe Expanding Universe?	Rhondazvous	42	9566	February 26, 2018 at 8:14 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet
	Quantum Physics Craziness!	LadyForCamus	19	3330	October 12, 2017 at 2:26 pm Last Post: Jehanne
	The Physics of Guinness	thesummerqueen	23	8877	September 2, 2017 at 8:25 am Last Post: LastPoet
	I have a layman's theory about quantum physics "spookiness"	Won2blv	15	3783	March 5, 2017 at 11:15 am Last Post: Won2blv
	SMASH Theory Claims to Solve 5 Major Questions of Physics	AFTT47	0	1571	February 20, 2017 at 10:14 pm Last Post: AFTT47
	Physics Nobel 2016	Alex K	8	2504	October 4, 2016 at 11:33 am Last Post: Jackalope

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Current time: July 27, 2025, 10:24 pm Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.Atheist Forums is 16 Years, 10 Months, 4 Weeks, 2 Days, 7 Hours, 37 Minutes, 44 Seconds old.
The views expressed on this website are those of the members who express them and do not necessarily represent the views of Atheist Forums, its owners, or staff.