Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: June 7, 2024, 11:23 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?

Jehanne

Away

Senior Member

Religious Views: n/a

Posts: 7259
Threads: 506
Joined: December 12, 2015
Reputation: 22

#1

Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?

March 4, 2017 at 6:38 am

Has basic Science now ended? In other words, are QED (Quantum Electrodynamics), QCD and General Relativity basically complete theories and there really is no hope of anything beyond those? Or, will String Theory, M Theory, or some successor theory unite all theories into something even greater, something that leads to testable predictions? Or, as Sean Carroll says, does it even matter:

[Image: Everyday-Equation.jpg]

[Image: Everyday-Equation.jpg]

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 6:38 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - March 4, 2017 at 7:35 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 7:36 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - March 4, 2017 at 7:39 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 7:52 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 8:44 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Cyberman - March 4, 2017 at 7:44 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 9:11 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 9:24 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 9:35 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 10:44 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by bennyboy - March 4, 2017 at 9:43 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 9:51 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 11:09 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 4, 2017 at 2:24 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by vorlon13 - March 4, 2017 at 12:43 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 12:52 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ErGingerbreadMandude - March 4, 2017 at 1:27 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by vorlon13 - March 4, 2017 at 4:17 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 4, 2017 at 5:58 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ignoramus - March 4, 2017 at 6:48 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Fireball - March 4, 2017 at 7:29 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Anomalocaris - March 4, 2017 at 9:03 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Alex K - March 5, 2017 at 2:21 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ignoramus - March 4, 2017 at 7:42 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by ignoramus - March 4, 2017 at 8:52 pm

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Mr Greene - March 5, 2017 at 5:16 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Jehanne - March 5, 2017 at 11:36 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by henryy123 - April 10, 2017 at 3:08 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by brewer - April 10, 2017 at 7:54 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by Brian37 - April 10, 2017 at 8:11 am

RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by dyresand - April 10, 2017 at 11:14 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	What does God have in common with String Theory?	LinuxGal	2	802	December 30, 2022 at 1:45 pm Last Post: Anomalocaris
	What are Laws of Nature?	vulcanlogician	63	4652	March 23, 2022 at 9:15 am Last Post: Rahn127
	Physics Puzzle	onlinebiker	32	2227	July 21, 2020 at 4:07 am Last Post: zebo-the-fat
	Physics questions	ignoramus	21	2057	May 9, 2019 at 6:27 pm Last Post: Anomalocaris
	What Does Gravity Have To Do WithThe Expanding Universe?	Rhondazvous	42	6424	February 26, 2018 at 8:14 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet
	Quantum Physics Craziness!	LadyForCamus	19	2071	October 12, 2017 at 2:26 pm Last Post: Jehanne
	The Physics of Guinness	thesummerqueen	23	7708	September 2, 2017 at 8:25 am Last Post: LastPoet
	I have a layman's theory about quantum physics "spookiness"	Won2blv	15	2821	March 5, 2017 at 11:15 am Last Post: Won2blv
	SMASH Theory Claims to Solve 5 Major Questions of Physics	AFTT47	0	1256	February 20, 2017 at 10:14 pm Last Post: AFTT47
	Physics Nobel 2016	Alex K	8	1944	October 4, 2016 at 11:33 am Last Post: Jackalope

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)