Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 8, 2024, 6:35 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
#4
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
(March 4, 2017 at 7:36 am)Alex K Wrote: What we have here is the so-called path integral of the Standard Model of particles physics, embedded in a quantized version of Einstein's General relativity.

There's one symbol hidden in this very formula which indicates that this description is not complete. It's the upper case letter Lambda (looks like an A without the cross bar) right below the first integral sign (the big S).  

k < Lambda tells you that we only take into account energies below the so-called cutoff energy scale Lambda, and ignore any goings-on higher than lambda. This is necessary because general relativity is what is called non-renormalizable - it contains infinities as you go to arbitrary large energies which cannot be gotten rid off in a consistent manner unless you introduce an infinite amount of paramters into the theory.

Strictly speaking, once we have this cutoff scale in the path integral, we need to include a whole infinite tail of additional terms into this formula to really capture the complete physics as observed at low energies.  As long as we study processes at energies far below the cutoff energy lambda, these additional terms contribute less and less to the physical goings-on and can be neglected to very good precision. But the necessity to have Lambda at all shows us the incompleteness of quantum gravity which is so often talked about.

Yeah, that's what I meant. Really it is.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - March 4, 2017 at 7:39 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What does God have in common with String Theory? LinuxGal 2 802 December 30, 2022 at 1:45 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  What are Laws of Nature? vulcanlogician 63 4655 March 23, 2022 at 9:15 am
Last Post: Rahn127
  Physics Puzzle onlinebiker 32 2227 July 21, 2020 at 4:07 am
Last Post: zebo-the-fat
  Physics questions ignoramus 21 2057 May 9, 2019 at 6:27 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  What Does Gravity Have To Do WithThe Expanding Universe? Rhondazvous 42 6424 February 26, 2018 at 8:14 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Quantum Physics Craziness! LadyForCamus 19 2071 October 12, 2017 at 2:26 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  The Physics of Guinness thesummerqueen 23 7708 September 2, 2017 at 8:25 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  I have a layman's theory about quantum physics "spookiness" Won2blv 15 2821 March 5, 2017 at 11:15 am
Last Post: Won2blv
  SMASH Theory Claims to Solve 5 Major Questions of Physics AFTT47 0 1256 February 20, 2017 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: AFTT47
  Physics Nobel 2016 Alex K 8 1945 October 4, 2016 at 11:33 am
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)