RE: Does Physics now have a complete description of Nature?
March 5, 2017 at 5:16 am
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2017 at 5:21 am by Mr Greene.)
So cutting a long story short; the Theories are generalisations subject to being superseded by more accurate descriptions (as happened to Newtonian physics).
They aren't set in stone and can be replaced given sufficient evidence...
Apparently it all makes sense if you ignore gravity...
They aren't set in stone and can be replaced given sufficient evidence...
Apparently it all makes sense if you ignore gravity...
![[Image: funny-hover-tiger-white-gravity.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=funny-pictures-quotes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F10%2Ffunny-hover-tiger-white-gravity.jpg)
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?-Esquilax
Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.