RE: Is it true that there is no absolute morality?
March 23, 2017 at 2:55 pm
(This post was last modified: March 23, 2017 at 3:00 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(March 5, 2017 at 2:45 pm)Nonpareil Wrote: subjectively true
THIS IS A COMPLETE OXYMORON.
All truths by their very nature are true objectively. Something can be objectively truly subjective ontologically (some objects are also conscious subjects) but nothing is subjectively true. That would mean non-objectively true which is the same as truly not objective or in other words FALSE AND NOT TRUE AT ALL.
So much fail.
(February 16, 2017 at 1:42 pm)Whateverist Wrote: To say that morality is not objective is a far cry from saying it is arbitrary.
To say morality is arbitary is a far cry from saying it is not objective.
(February 16, 2017 at 1:57 pm)WisdomOfTheTrees Wrote:(February 16, 2017 at 1:42 pm)Whateverist Wrote: To say that morality is not objective is a far cry from saying it is arbitrary.Well, you've given me no reason to think otherwise.
Non-sequiturs don't have to be demonstrated. Demonstrate your sequitur.
