so-called "moon landing" question

[theVOID]

Moon conspiracy nonsense

Your're asking completely the wrong question, what you should be asking is "What is more likely, that we landed on the moon or that this was a conspiracy?"

Given that we have rockets that can reach the moon and far beyond, we have sent a great many people into space and we have probes that can land on moons and other terrestrial bodies it doesn't seem implausible that, in principle, we could send a manned rocket to the moon.

The conspiracy on the other hand requires that 1. We created a fake rocket and capsule (highly plausible), 2. We created a studio to replicate the moon (highly plausible), 3. The NASA scientists managed to accurately simulate all the conditions in a studio given the available technology in the 1960s, (highly implausible) 4. We managed to convince every single person involved in the conspiracy to never say anything about it (highly implausible), 5. The NASA scientists are so completely incompetent that some quack on the internet managed to expose their technical flaws (implausible).

Given the prior probabilities alone it seems very likely that the moon landing did in fact happen, As for your points of contention about the evidence which could change the probability of either scenario being true, the others have answered those questions sufficiently. They are fully consistent with a moon landing, that doesn't prove that it happened, it simply means your argument that it could not have happened given the evidence is false.

which is a zionist propaganda tool just like bbc and co?

@ This ^

I didn't know Jimmy Wales was a Jew, unless he died his hair Ginger and his face pale to look Irish as part of the conspiracy...