RE: Why can't Christians accept the fact that Hitler was a Christian
April 17, 2017 at 9:59 am
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2017 at 10:02 am by Drich.)
(April 14, 2017 at 1:16 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote:First of all wiki = source material. at the end of every page there are links to legitimate proof and sources. if you are too ill equip to source 'proof' from a wiki page you really should just lurk on the side lines and let the adults speak on topics like this. If however you need/want help sourcing more legit material from the wiki source material provided just say the word, and I will be glad to show you how to use wiki for something other than a weak minded cop out.(April 13, 2017 at 4:19 pm)Drich Wrote: This is what kills me. I provide proof, that Hitler HATED Christianity and selective ignorance demands you pretend to not see the proof, and recite a lie that you find comforting..
Looks like Zum Von IZ Movin Zee Goal Posten!!!
Read Zee OP Again Mein Moron!
No vhere in Zee OP dothest it zay Hitler didn't fool Christians! It zayz Heim Hitler Vas a Christian!!!
Den, Pleaze Explain Heir Fireball!
First of all, Wikipedia does not equal proof. This is the problem with christian "reasoning". If it's written and supports your argument, it's true. If it doesn't, no matter who it's by, it's wrong.
(April 14, 2017 at 3:06 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote:(April 14, 2017 at 2:59 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Brian is right. Discounting Wiki because it's Wiki is in need of a name so it can be listed in the logical fallacies.
If he would have worded it as evidence, rather than proof I would have kept my mouth shut. So tired of misusing words for their own bullshit.
And why would I do that?? look at all the 'fun' that has taken place (and how many time you've been put back into place) regarding your thoughts concerning this particular material source.
