(April 24, 2017 at 4:56 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(April 24, 2017 at 3:59 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Are you familiar with the genetic fallacy. Because that is what it appears you are doing.
Can you clarify what you meaning by selling something? How would this relate to a scientist trying to sell me on climate change (or as I like to call it... fine tuning of the atmosphere)? Or how about your trying to sell me this idea now... are you neutral? There may be some things on which I agree, but this wording seems awkward.
Also... wrong again, on what you imagine I am trying to do. I should start a counter or something. But just a tip... if you let me speak for myself, then I can't claim a straw man.
"Are you familiar with the genetic fallacy= The Hindu creator God Brahama"
"Are you familiar with the genetic falacy= Allah"
"Are you familiar with the genetic fallacy= Buddha"
"Are you familiar with the genetic fallacy=Yahweh"
"Are you familiar with the genetic fallacy=Apollo"
"Are you familiar with the genetic fallacy= Yoda"
If you are going to point out this "genetic fallacy" to be NEUTRAL you would have to be willing to plug all other claims into that same claim. If you are not willing to do that you are simply mentally masturbating trying to use sciencey sounding words to eventually point right back to your own bias position.
You are speaking for yourself, but you are not speaking neutrally for yourself. Which is why I challenged you in the OP with that question which you refuse to ask YOURSELF.
Ok.... you don't know what the genetic fallacy is....
but do demonstrate fairly well, that you are just rambling with little coherence.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
