RE: Is there any evidence we dont live on in some way after death
July 15, 2011 at 5:24 pm
(This post was last modified: July 15, 2011 at 5:26 pm by Anomalocaris.)
So, Xonage
The evidence of "everything known to be connected with the functioning of a thing has been destroyed" is in all other cases accepted as sufficent evidence under present knowldeg for accepting the hypothesis that the function itself has stopped. All structures and processes known to be associated with the functioning of that collection of thoughts and behaviors distinguishable as you is destroyed around the time of your death. If you don't think it is, I can come to your place of residence and make completely sure.
So explain why in this case the same type and caliber of evidence is not sufficient under present knowldeg. Because you don't wish it to be?
Go back and get some small measure of intellectual integrity so as to make your worth talking down to before coming back.
The evidence of "everything known to be connected with the functioning of a thing has been destroyed" is in all other cases accepted as sufficent evidence under present knowldeg for accepting the hypothesis that the function itself has stopped. All structures and processes known to be associated with the functioning of that collection of thoughts and behaviors distinguishable as you is destroyed around the time of your death. If you don't think it is, I can come to your place of residence and make completely sure.
So explain why in this case the same type and caliber of evidence is not sufficient under present knowldeg. Because you don't wish it to be?
Go back and get some small measure of intellectual integrity so as to make your worth talking down to before coming back.
