RE: The Truth about Vaccines:A quick refutation
May 3, 2017 at 3:53 pm
(This post was last modified: May 3, 2017 at 3:56 pm by John V.)
(May 3, 2017 at 3:49 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Christ you're dishonest.
What's the error in the logic? Why can't your position on low probability of exposure due to expected sexual activity be applied to other situations of low probability of exposure?
(May 3, 2017 at 3:52 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(May 3, 2017 at 3:51 pm)alpha male Wrote: Oh go fuck yourself. It takes two to tango. This is effectively saying, We shouldn't be discussing this...but I'm not leaving it without getting the last word in.You're free to stop any time. It's not like I'll call you out on it once you quit.
We shouldn't be focusing on this because it's a path of discussion that leads absolutely nowhere, especially with someone being as deliberately obtuse as you are. I'm done. It's like trying to have a conversation with Rik but with a modicum of better English.
Good. In summary, the statistics regarding compliance with Gardasil imply that a significant number of people who are complaining about anti-vaxxers are anti-vaxxers themselves, unless you make an ad hoc change to the typical usage of the term.
