RE: The Truth about Vaccines:A quick refutation
May 3, 2017 at 3:57 pm
(This post was last modified: May 3, 2017 at 3:57 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
(May 3, 2017 at 3:53 pm)alpha male Wrote:(May 3, 2017 at 3:49 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Christ you're dishonest.
What's the error in the logic? Why can't your position on low probability of exposure due to expected sexual activity be applied to other situations of low probability of exposure?
(May 3, 2017 at 3:52 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: We shouldn't be focusing on this because it's a path of discussion that leads absolutely nowhere, especially with someone being as deliberately obtuse as you are. I'm done. It's like trying to have a conversation with Rik but with a modicum of better English.
Good. In summary, the statistics regarding compliance with Gardasil imply that a significant number of people who are complaining about anti-vaxxers are anti-vaxxers themselves, unless you make an ad hoc change to the typical usage of the term.
And we should do all we can to increase the rates of HPV vaccination in order to better protect ourselves and others. Hooray. See how easy that is when you don't focus on the label?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson
