RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!
May 8, 2017 at 8:52 am
(This post was last modified: May 8, 2017 at 8:56 am by Whateverist.)
(May 8, 2017 at 5:30 am)Little Rik Wrote:(May 7, 2017 at 2:53 pm)Whateverist Wrote: I'm sad too, Rik. Sad to learn you are reading comprehension challenged in addition to real world adverse.
Try again. I never said science is the only way to know. In fact, I was specifically laying out how one might remain scientifically literate while maintaining beliefs which cannot be verified by science. But nuance is probably the first thing to go once you adopt the spiritual dogma, hey mate?
Mate.
By saying......You can trust science-the-method to investigate the nature of the empirical world more than any other method ever proposed..............you already say something wrong.
Intuitional science was proposed thousand years before anyone would start physical science.
But again by praising physical science as the cream of knowledge you once again fail to see too far in front of your nose.
Was intuitional 'science' truly ever proposed or was it just grunted by primitives who wouldn't understand the idea of a conditional? Of course I realize you think I've said something incorrect. But of course your perspective is relative to the odd things you believe, one of which is that only you are in touch with the absolute truth. (Not one person here is impressed with your 'credentials'.)
