RE: Can someone tell me where in the 2nd amendment it says you can carry machine guns?
May 10, 2017 at 8:56 am
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2017 at 9:04 am by Brian37.)
(May 10, 2017 at 8:48 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: The video I posted showed a handgun that had a cyclic rate of fire of >120 rounds a minute. Home defense spray-and-pray people should be very excited by that.
And this is the worst part right here, and again, not just on the issue of firearms but any subject.
I cant even point you YOU who owns firearms who admits some of this is getting way out of hand.
Same BS argument the car companies pulled when Nadar said, "Um guys, your products could be safer"
Car companies, "ME ME ME RIGHTS RIGHT RIGHTS'
Economy, "I think the top 1% billionaires have too much power currently"
Ostriches " ME ME ME, RIGHTS RIGHTS RIGHTS"
Me, "Holy crap can people try, just for a second to try to understand it is not what you want but the way we are going about it currently?"
And to anyone reading this, you cant claim I made Gawdzilla's post, he did and he owns firearms.
I think 36,000 firearm deaths is unacceptable. 98 firearm deaths per day. I would hope that all sides involved would want to reduce that number.
(May 10, 2017 at 8:24 am)Lutrinae Wrote: We are well past discussing regulations with gun-fondlers who will not listen to reason, and now it is time to just take all their guns away from them to ensure a safer world.
No, see that is what makes the worse. I only want to prevent the unreasonable, not the reasonable. Gawdzilla owns firearms too, but he is willing to admit we have a problem.
But they cant even see over in the Middle East it is far worse as far as blind worship, mixed with defending that worship with weapons.
I cannot make this clear enough. It is a utopia to want to remove every single firearm. It is reasonable to keep them out of the hands of the mentally ill, the violent felon, the domestic abuser, and the religious nut.
I am fine with extensive stress training, vetting so that list above doesn't get them. I am for hunting and home defense but again, within reason.
The way we view firearms currently is unhealthy, it is like car companies and big oil paying lawyers to keep lead in gas, and shout "You are anti transportation" when all you are saying is, "No we simply need to be pragmatic and look for better and more clean fuel technology"