(May 9, 2017 at 6:14 pm)Valyza1 Wrote: I never thought nor implied that you were trying to convince anyone. What I did assume was that you had some generous motive for answering in the first place.
[edit]also, no. I don't consider reality a point of view. I consider your point of view a point of view. The absence of a god is not "reality". It is not science. It is a way of seeing the world. Period.
About paragraph 1: Consider generous of me to even bother to answer the OP. I value my time and consider that in my free time I gave the OP an answer. This is a discussion forum, is it not?
About your ETA: please do not compare my view of reality to a theistic one. While you are trying to shift the burden of proof, it is me that deal with real life, people and the natural word. Theists are the ones that need to define precisely and prove, so that anyone can see, of their god, whatever that is. The same thing I say about believers in the tooth fairy. It is an extraordinary claim, usually Its theists that have to provide proof of that.
Until then, I can safely say theists sell Shit for Shinola, and call them on their bullshit. If ot hurts your sensibilities, oh well. Too bad.
