(June 5, 2017 at 7:20 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Alex, putting myself in the mindset of a theist, think I know where he's coming from.
For a zero net sum early universe, he wants to know why the net zero isn't just " nothing".
Why does it have to be composed of 2 alternate energies resulting in a net zero.
Is this a theoretical explanation or is it occurring in nature constantly?
Is this argument a little like abiogenesis where we know we are here and hence work backwards to find a natural explanation? I assume neither can be proven or recreated in a lab.
OP, please know that if skyfairies exist, science will be the first to let you know, I promise.
Lots of nobels to go around when the time comes... Until then, don't waste your time with bronze age fairy tales.
It is ocurring in nature constantly. The particle-antiparticle pairs which constantly appear in the vacuum due to the uncertainty of matter fields do basically the same thing.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition