(May 4, 2009 at 6:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Maybe I agree with you. Maybe Dawkins is a true philosopher, one without a cause as yet. (only in that atheism can't be a cause). I like the definitions "love of knowledge" and "the desire to know". I'd say that's how I started out. I always said "I want to know". I suppose we separate where your desire stems from science and mine from spirituality. I never think of spiritual truths in scientific terms. Practical, real terms that effect people and their basic needs yeah, but never nit picking attempts to explain the real world in terms of what chemical process leads to perceived aesthetic perfection in humans. I see that as scientific phychobabble.
Who said Dawkins cause is atheism? As far as I know his cause is reason.
I see what most regard as philosophy as psychobabble ... I will continue to believe that until the day they come up with something worthwhile.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
