(June 26, 2017 at 9:31 pm)Astonished Wrote: Okay, all you agnostics here, if you want my two cents...tell me, what is it you're still unsure about that you are willing to say you haven't got enough information or knowledge to make a probabilistic determination about whatever it is you are suspending judgment about? I can't render an opinion without further information, so in this case, I'm agnostic about what opinion to have about y'alls. Also, what do you (this is down to the individual's opinion) consider to be adequate information/evidence to make an assumption, and do you require a certain minimum probability before accepting something as true, or are you the sort who require 'absolute' certainty?
It isn't about uncertainty. It is about incoherence and improperly applied language.
