(June 28, 2017 at 6:06 pm)dyresand Wrote:(June 28, 2017 at 1:47 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: The guy is innocent of destroying the Ten Commandments mounment because those were not the real Ten Commandments in the first place. So if I was on the jury and if the DA even mentioned the words "Ten Commandments" I would vote "Not Guilty" on all charges.
The "ten commandments" are not apart of the christian doctrine... if christians did read their god damn bible they would realize they were destroyed when moses came down the mountain and the laws were lost and nullified after that.
So what was all that shite about Jeebus saying all the old laws were still to be obeyed?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
