Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 2, 2025, 4:34 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Stephen Hawking on M-Theory
#6
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory
(July 25, 2011 at 7:35 am)Ziggystardust Wrote:
(July 25, 2011 at 7:29 am)theVOID Wrote: Sure, it's the only candidate because it's essentially the only anywhere near completed model we have. There is always Garret Lisi's E8 theory but it's got a lot of problems, for instance he needs to achieve some intricate symmetries between leptons and bosons which as many physicists say is not like adding apples and oranges but apples and thunderbolts.

I'm a huge fan of M-Theory, it's just more surprising and fascinating the more you learn about it, and there might just be some evidence for it in cosmology, depending on whether or not the phenomenon of Dark Flow is adequately confirmed - It was predicted by string theorists prior to turning up in the WMAP data, so that kind of predictive power impresses me immensely.

Another favourite of mine is the Holographic Principle, that really fucks with my head, I can't begin to comprehend it beyond it's description of black holes and even that is dense, but that applied to the entire universe, the thought that my 3D experience is a projection from a 2D vibrating surface encompassing the universe is truly mind boggling.

I know only a little about M-Theory and virtually nothing about the Holographic Principle. I need to read more about it in the very near future.

actually that not true, it not the complete model or theory but an all incompassing one. Basically M theory includes all the major GUT such as the 5 various string, super Gravity and S8XS8. The main problem is that it is so broad that it cannot not make any independent predictions that we can test to verify if it truely correct...

Lately Cern and other Major Partical accelerators has collected data that seem to fall away from all the major GUT that M theory embrace, instead it appears the data matches the prediction of a subset of SuperSymmetry theory called MSSM (Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model ).
this would be a major Blow to M theory.

the Holographic Principle, depends on symmetry that is only observe in anti Desitter universe, which many observations indicate that our universe is not, but it make useful mathematical models that help M theorist tackle major issues dealing with Structure of Space time. Another blow to the Holographic Principle came recently when Observation of several Frequencies of light from a distant Quasar fail to show any indication of a fine structure of space time, at least at a scale of Planck length or greater...

So at the moment MSSM is the leading candiated for a Grand unfication Theory..
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Justtristo - July 25, 2011 at 6:52 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by theVOID - July 25, 2011 at 7:29 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Justtristo - July 25, 2011 at 7:35 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by theVOID - July 25, 2011 at 9:21 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Anomalocaris - July 25, 2011 at 2:22 pm
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Justtristo - July 25, 2011 at 6:35 pm
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by lanceromega - July 25, 2011 at 9:26 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by theVOID - July 25, 2011 at 10:25 pm
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by The Grand Nudger - July 25, 2011 at 8:24 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by The Grand Nudger - July 25, 2011 at 9:28 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by lanceromega - July 25, 2011 at 9:36 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by The Grand Nudger - July 25, 2011 at 9:37 am
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Autumnlicious - July 25, 2011 at 2:56 pm
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Anomalocaris - July 25, 2011 at 3:25 pm
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Autumnlicious - July 25, 2011 at 3:32 pm
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by Anomalocaris - July 25, 2011 at 10:55 pm
RE: Stephen Hawking on M-Theory - by theVOID - July 25, 2011 at 11:52 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What does God have in common with String Theory? LinuxGal 2 1048 December 30, 2022 at 1:45 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Hawking and Krauss Interaktive 22 9677 June 15, 2019 at 7:25 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Teaching the Big bang theory to Preschoolers GeorgiasTelescope 5 1870 June 24, 2017 at 6:22 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  I wrote the first book to teach the Big Bang theory to Preschoolers! GeorgiasTelescope 0 753 June 12, 2017 at 10:17 pm
Last Post: GeorgiasTelescope
  When and Where did the Atomic Theory Come From? Rhondazvous 29 10464 May 13, 2017 at 8:31 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  I have a layman's theory about quantum physics "spookiness" Won2blv 15 3329 March 5, 2017 at 11:15 am
Last Post: Won2blv
  SMASH Theory Claims to Solve 5 Major Questions of Physics AFTT47 0 1348 February 20, 2017 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: AFTT47
  Paul Rudd vs Stephen Hawking - Quantum Chess Heat 1 1327 January 28, 2016 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Black Hole/Parallel Universe Theory Heat 9 3687 October 21, 2015 at 10:08 pm
Last Post: Heat
  Superfluid vacuum theory Psychonaut 0 1342 September 23, 2015 at 11:47 am
Last Post: Psychonaut



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)