(May 5, 2009 at 5:02 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You seem to have misunderstood my point. My point is that there is no evidence, that the overwhelming evidence leads one to rationally conclude that those references could be non factual. That would support my argument.
Okay frodo we agree that there is no evidence,and that the references I mentioned could be non factual.I see this as a contradiction since I was speaking about the historicity of Christ in my last post.If the historicity of Christ could be non factual due to the lack of evidence then you are basically worshipping a mythological personage.That is sort of like taking advice from the great Confucius or Buddah himself.If you state that the bible is full of moral teachings and most of those things taught there are meant to be taken spiritually,then please tell me where do you get your concept of spirit?Since it is also a given that the existence of a spirit is like god himself another thing that cannot be defined or scientifically discerned.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
