What is required for a human organism to be considered a rights bearer?

[Thumpalumpacus]

Thanks for the kind reply here, I torched you on another thread because you questioned my honesty.
I don't take kindly to that
I try to be polite and will continue to if treated that way, but when my integrity is impugned, I tend to lash out, You can only take me at my word, but I would ask, based on my questions and responses, what would you say that I have brought up that would make me a troll?

Hitting a hot-button topic on your entry here is going to garner skepticism. It's not like I or others know you and have a baseline. The fact that this topic seems to drive most of your posts makes me wonder about the depth you bring.

I value opinoins because people have them. Can I only ask for opinions of people I know?
Have you even read my introduction page? I posted my motives clearly there and would refer you to it.

You can of course ask opinions of anyone you wish. I just find it odd that you'd drop this question in as you have here, asking people whose opinions you have no metric for, and pushing the subject.

But just becuase you don't understand or didn't bother to find out does not give you cause or right question my integrity. If my actions or words lead to that conclusion, then I will own that, but I would then ask you to specify what action or words did so.
Thanks

I, and everyone else here, have the right to question any goddamned thing we have questions about.

---

I have not asked a question about in relation to anyone else, these are suppositions and leaps that you are making, not me. I only ask what is required to be considerd a bearer of human rights? What part of that questions states that one takes precidence over another?

I've answered this question. Why are you asking yet again if you're not trolling?