RE: Ken Ham's Creation museum is FAILING!!!!!
July 6, 2017 at 12:01 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2017 at 12:04 am by Astonished.)
(July 5, 2017 at 11:57 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(July 5, 2017 at 7:19 pm)Astonished Wrote: What investor in all honesty could possibly have thought this was worth throwing money at?The kind that salivates at the prospect of state subsidies. That's what this whole thing was based off of, not the fucking bible. What's remarkable is that they managed to fail in spite of an initial 20% subsidy (combined with recurring subsidies taken directly out of employee paychecks..I shit you not). The problem was that during the states legal claim against Hams organization the power shifted from a democrat to a republican (one of three repubs to serve in that capacity in the last 70 years.........).
The republican could not be publicly seen going against the ark park in the political climate of that time..even though everyone -and I mean everyone- at that point, already knew it would lose money.
Well, but whatever private investors he had to bilk out of quite a bit of cash have to be calling for his head, right? Why aren't we hearing anything of that sort? It can't have possibly all come exclusively out of the state's funding and subsidies, right? Or out of Ham's own pocket, he's at least above the minimum level of IQ needed to avoid being labeled mentally handicapped to have the foresight not to put his own ill-gotten fortune at risk.
(July 5, 2017 at 7:22 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:It's a museum, not an amusement park, so even the name is a lie.
I disagree. Museums display actual exhibits. Amusement parks provide thrills. This is a creatard thrill palace. It has no museum quality at all.
Unless you want to count the fact that the whole thing is a coprolite.
I meant that there's just displays and not really anything to interact with. Didn't say anything about quality or content. It sure as shit isn't a zoo. But yeah, what they do skirts the line of being the bare minimum required to call itself a museum. But then if they called it that, they'd certainly have even less appeal (what kid wants to go to a museum?) so deliberately and dishonestly calling it a 'park' is just one more charge to add to their tally of criminal activities. Can't wait to hear that someone got molested in one of the bathrooms, let's see Ham spin that in a positive way.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.