RE: My question to pro-choice supporters
July 8, 2017 at 6:24 pm
(This post was last modified: July 8, 2017 at 6:34 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(July 8, 2017 at 4:19 pm)Aliza Wrote: He may not want to be a parent, but if he doesn't even want tax payers to pay for the child that he wants to abandon, then that's just too bad. You can't have your cake and eat it too on this one. Even mothers who abandon their kids in fire departments understand that it's a tax payer supported foster care system that supports the child. The kid doesn't just magically go away just because someone wishes it. Someone has to take care of it.No, kids 'don't magically go away..it takes a medical procedure....? If a person doesn;t have that procedure, knowing that they cannot afford the child..it is they - and no one else- who has thrust that burden upon the taxpayer. Personally, I don;t consider it much of a burden. If the point of taxes isn't to support citizens and their needs..then what -is- the point?
(rhetorical, I know, corporate welfare and mcmansions for senators, ofc)
Quote:Sad as it may be, our ancestors chose our fates eons ago. The sexual reproductive system is what it is and we have to play the hand we're dealt. Fairness doesn't factor into the equation.Put than on a posterboard and go picket and abortion clinic?
Quote:A fetus is fully in the mother's custody until it's birthed and it's up to her and only her to decide whether to bring it to term or not.I agree, so does the law, and who's suggesting otherwise?
Quote:The bad cards don't lie entirely in the hands of the men, though. Women also have disadvantages to deal with. She doesn't get unlimited number of abortions, and abortions carry physical risk to her health, safety and future fertility. Even if she gives the baby up for adoption, she has to go through the process of carrying and delivering the baby, she has to go through the hormonal changes, and the feelings of losing a child.-and she unilaterally makes the choice in -all- of that, that choice being federally protected by nothing less than the constitution of the united states as outlined in RvW. What's the problem?
I;m beginning to suspect that a great many people who believe they support reproductive rights, in actuality, do not. They support unjustifiable state enforced inequality and -womens- rights. A nation full of captain save-a-hos to the rescue. She doesn't need saving, she's a big girl, fully empowered to take this matter into her own hands. Or not?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
