(July 10, 2017 at 1:51 pm)Nymphadora Wrote:(July 9, 2017 at 8:51 am)Succubus Wrote: By the Vatican.Based on the above, I would say if something is not entirely gluten-free, then gluten isn't banned. It still has gluten in it.
As if those arseholes didn't have enough real issues to contend with.
So gluten, which is natural, is banned, but GMS's which are unnatural are not?
I know.
Quote:Edit, I made a balls of that, but fuck it.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.