(July 12, 2017 at 11:35 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I'm thinking that the original post speaks something to the poster's mindset. I also think that "Mrs Tibs" having such a thing done is horseshit. The original post was caught on the fly, as has happened plenty before with no such editing, and at that point it seems relevant to me.
Is there a rule against quoting edited posts in order to show meaning or motive? Once you hit "send", it's out in the wild. I've edited many posts, mostly for spelling, and sometimes to take out rudeness. And unlike some people, I'm willing to own that.
Bold mine.
Here is one accusation of staff bias. Mrs Tibs heh? Hell, she has a name. Here you suggest that the fact Shell is Tibs wife influences us as staff, bias. And you just a few posts doubled it down to myself.
So you don't want to apologise, its fine. But you know what they say, injectives only dishonor those that utter them.
