Objective morality as a proper basic belief

[The Grand Nudger]

No, it doesn't, what makes it an objective standard, is it's independence from any given subject and ability to be demonstrated as such.  What makes it a moral standard is it's fundamental relationship to moral statements.  It's what we're talking about.  Ergo, an objective moral standard.  When we ask ourselves, "what is the moral fact of the matter" in some x...well, harm.  Why is rape bad?  Because it causes harm.  Why is standing between a rapist and a victim good?  Because it stops or preempts that very same harm.  

The two of us agreeing is moral agreement, some asshole elsewhere disagreeing..is moral disagreement, but it doesn't change or alter the objectivity of the standard itself..it's just some asshole disagreeing....just as some schmuck thinking that rape is the greatest good (cuz his seed so stronk)won't change anything about the harm it causes to the victim.  

Because we have a need to reduce confrontation and conflict, particularly when another person does not or may not know that we meant no harm.  It;s called being polite, I;m sure you've heard of it.   We don't apologize only for being in the wrong, morally or otherwise.

So you don't feel bad when you accidentally hurt someone? You only feel scared that they will hurt you for it?

What part of any of the above leads you to conclude or ask that?  

Personally...I have this thing I tell my children.  Don't be sorry, behave.
(I generally don't fear other people...but that's only because I have it on good authority that I'm objectively the worst person in any given room... )