RE: Debunking Christianity? It's actually quite as simple as asking "why?"
July 28, 2011 at 5:32 am
(July 28, 2011 at 4:22 am)Emanuel Wrote: Well, given that the flood was local, he would have not take only local animals. It's easier to see it this way. So, no dinos, elephants, giraffes, and other things.
Well of course no dinos. They died out 65 million years ago.
Now the idiot must of known that there was going to be a flood. Somehow. Since you can't build a large boat in the middle of a fucking flood. Next - He probably used wood from a barn or some other wooden structure since producing boards would take longer. Also, the only animals a farmer would take would be his livestock. Since they are most important to him, they are his lively hood. So a boat big enough to hold his farm animals to save them from a local flood that he knew would happen, perhaps because he knows the land well and saw his environment changing rapidly.
No running around saving every animal in the area shit. No global flood. A farmer who may of had help, just saving his farm animals.
Religion likes to twist events to make it seem god had something to do with it. Just a local flood and a normal farmer saving his animals. That's about it.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
