RE: Blind evolution or intelligent design?
July 31, 2017 at 8:07 am
(This post was last modified: July 31, 2017 at 8:08 am by Gawdzilla Sama.)
(July 31, 2017 at 7:05 am)ignoramus Wrote: I think we can all confidently say that the theory of evolution doesn't have or even need a competing theory.
It's only the theists demanding an equal alternative.
It provides predictions that are testable, like Tiktaalik, so the basic principles do, indeed, work. We might find a driving force some day that trumps "those fit to survive", but that's science. No magic required.
(July 31, 2017 at 7:29 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:(July 31, 2017 at 6:55 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: If the choice is between evolution and design, the correct answer is ALWAYS 'evolution'.
Boru
Too bad evolution has to own up to such embarrassing failures as creationists.
Anomalies, who cares.
(See what I did there? )