(July 31, 2017 at 11:16 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: But not sure how me not Googling her pic will reduce the damage at this point. She'll never know I didn't look. The harm was done when the pics were released on the internet. I empathize with how she must feel about strangers ogling her nude pics when she never intended that. It would be cold to contemplate that and then rush off to do some ogling myself.
But someone who likes to view nude celebrity pics of Anniston is going to find them, even if they're faked. Short of some sort of software to find and erase them, there's not much to be done about it. I'm not sure if it completes the journey from just creepy to plain wrong though.
Thought experiment: change Jennifer Aniston's pics to child porn. I know it's extreme, but the same argument gets made all the time by pedophiles. Is there a reason why the standard applies only in one situation? I think the comparison is fair.
(July 31, 2017 at 12:46 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: It's almost like there still exists this underlying, subconscious mentality that women are walking temptations and men are gonna do what men are gonna do.
Hmmm...
almost, huh?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
