(August 2, 2017 at 7:34 pm)Khemikal Wrote: It's a rational point. It would be anthropocentric bias if there was no indication that it were true and assumed so anyway, but we have every indication that it's true.
You've created a society (as a thought experiment in murderous nationalist racism) in which people can be drugged and drug off and then maintain that you've caused no suffering?
Is -that- a rational point?
Yeah, I don't know where the fuck he pulled out that next point, I was still talking about human vs. animal stuff. Total tangent there, wasn't even remotely ready to shift gears into human-focused stuff. Not nearly comparable as I would have not been justified in using those same arguments for human-only rights. Kind of makes me feel like I wasted my time.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
