(August 6, 2017 at 2:14 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(August 5, 2017 at 1:27 pm)chimp3 Wrote: Late to this thread. As a father of two daughters I apply this rule: What if that was my daughter? I have to say that it is wrong to publish photo's of people given in confidence and without their permission. I am no prude , I just think consent is fundamental.
Yep, this is it right here. Consent is fundamental to sexuality. It isn't right to look at someone's naked body/sex parts without their consent and against their will. It's really no different from peeping tomery. Also, treat women the way you would want others to treat your own daughter.
You're right, consent is fundamental. But the moment you give your consent to allow nude photos of yourself to exist, you have accepted the fact that there is a risk they could end up in public. Sorry but that just goes with the deal. Every man woman and child alive today has seen countless examples of nude photos of people leaking out into public view without their permission. You do not get to pretend that sort of thing does not happen nor do you get to pretend that no one told you it could happen. Therefore if you give your consent to have yourself photographed nude, you agree to accept the consequences should those photos become public. Choices have consequences. Isn't that a lesson every parent is supposed to teach their kids about?
