(August 14, 2017 at 4:07 pm)rjh4 is back Wrote:Brian37 Wrote:No sorry, again, why should I ignore that?
Nobody is talking about your legal right to make that claim. I am simply not fooled when you claim you have no agenda.
You, "I am a Christian". You admit that.
FINE, but you are still here in this thread making claims about non-life going to life.
FINE AGAIN.....
So where do you think that "non life to life" ends up pointing to?
Be careful in your response.
What God do you think answers why we are here?
Now don't be a coward and now try to avoid your position.
You DO think your God is the cause of all this otherwise why hold "religious views" as "Christian" as your position?
WHAT GOD do you think started all this?
Sigh!
Let's recap Brian.
Yes, my very first post did include the following: "Perhaps no atheists wanted to push back as doing so might highlight the lack of any known naturalistic mechanism for forming life from non-life????" See post #9.
Later, after some discussion with Mr. Agenda, I saw the error of my ways in the claim that I made and withdrew the claim. See post #171.
If I made any other claims that you want me to address, please point them out.
The rest of any conversation we were having was a result of your claim in post #168 that said: "Close proximity of individual atoms that by themselves are not a living thing, but because they bond like magnets exchanging electrons, that makes it very easy to go from non life to life."
I asked some pointed questions about your claim that you could not answer (or ignored) and you did not provide any proof of your claim that it is very easy to go from non life to life.
So unless you can show me another claim that I made that I need to respond to, I will consider the ball still in your court to provide proof of your claim.
Please note, Brian, at least a couple of atheists here agreed with me that your claim above was silly and/or unproven. (If you want, I could provide the post numbers for those also.) Consequently, the lack of proof of your claim clearly does not necessarily lead to: therefore, no God. If you want to jump there that is up to you.
In your last couple of questions, you seem to be trying to goad me into making some conclusion, just so you can say "see you were trying to prove God exists". Nice try, but no cigar. Whatever conclusions you draw are on you.
Yea lets recap shall we?
You, " I am not trying to argue my God."
Me, " Sure that is what you say. But even without posting it, you still believe your God did it."
Do you believe your God of the bible did all this or not?
I will laugh in your face knowing that your "religious views" you claim to be a Christian.
So unless you are lying to me, I am right to assume that is what you think as being the cause to all this.
NOW ANSWER THE QUESTION.....
DO YOU BELIEVE THE GOD OF THE BIBLE STARTED ALL THIS?
Yes or no will do.