The Argument From Design

[ElDinero]

Cop-out, none of you can explain it and Dawkins is a rambling nut job. Dawkins never explained the optic nerve nor the development of the part of the brain responsible for sight, nothing about how the image is inverted.

Don't ignore my post. Go back, read it, respond. I don't care about the optic nerve. I don't need to explain it. Your argument requires that everything in the world be designed, so you have to explain EEEEEEEEEVERRRRRRRRYTHIIIIIIIING. We've given you plenty of examples of things that, if they were designed, would be shit designs. Do not tiptoe around this again. If you insist on contributing to my thread, then respond to posts made directly addressing you. People have responded to yours and you have brushed it off without even watching the Dawkins video (he is a fucking biologist, he knows exactly what he is talking about).

Now, one more time. Explain the appendix, explain the design of humans needing 8 hours sleep a day, explain why we can live without three of our internal organs, explain why the human reproductive system is so inefficient, explain why we can't inhabit vast areas of the world. If you cannot do this, then admit that no all-knowing being could have designed these things, or at the very least stop clogging up my thread with your irrelevant challenges.