(August 4, 2011 at 1:35 am)Godschild Wrote: Engineered, no camera, digital or other wise comes close to human vision, even the best supercomputers can not process the info from the eye to the brain and then to the hand to reach out and touch an object as fast as the brain can,so do not spout your drivel at me. Yes squid, eagles and other animals have superior eyesight, they need to because of their enviroment. You don't see any of them living in the wild that are blind. I never said the Bible explains the eye or other body parts, the Bible is a spiritual book, the context of it has to do with the spiritual life and very little with the physical life. You would not understand this though, you are only interested in demonizing God's word. Yes I'm very concerned about the human eye, glacoma runs in my family and this is a highly inheritable disease as a matter of fact everyone on my father's side of the family has glacoma except myself and two nephews, so yes I'm very interested in the human eye.
Go and answer my post, stop ignoring it just because you don't have the answers. Your post has raised a couple more points:
1. If the Bible says so little about the physical life, how do you feel qualified to comment on whether or not things are designed? Just because it says he created everything? We deal in evidence here.
2. What kind of design would allow for the human eye to catch glaucoma so readily? You'd better get the idea that if things were designed, the design would be a load of shit.
3. There are plenty of animals living in the wild that have very poor eyesight. Moles and bats spring to mind instantly. You are right that the potency of a creature's eyesight is directly related to its environment; that is evolution at work right there.
Now I've told you, if you're going to clog up this thread with your uneducated ramblings, have the courtesy to address the points people are making.
