RE: Tyson Slams Deniers!
September 8, 2017 at 5:07 pm
(This post was last modified: September 8, 2017 at 5:12 pm by Jehanne.)
As promised, here is my regression analysis. It is a simple regression equation, the first with temperature versus CO2 levels, the second identical to the first, except I had a categorical variable for heavy volcanism:
Quote:Regression Analysis: Temp versus CO2 level
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Regression 1 494525 494525 2500.71 0.000
CO2 level 1 494525 494525 2500.71 0.000
Error 704 139219 198
Lack-of-Fit 679 136978 202 2.25 0.008
Pure Error 25 2241 90
Total 705 633744
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
14.0625 78.03% 78.00% 77.90%
Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant -326.42 7.14 -45.74 0.000
CO2 level 1.0109 0.0202 50.01 0.000 1.00
Regression Equation
Temp = -326.42 + 1.0109 CO2 level
Quote:Regression Analysis: Temp versus CO2 level, VolcanicWhile both models are kind of "back of the envelope," the second is clearly to be preferred as major volcanic activity does have a very short-term and minor impact on the Earth's climate, but by far, the dominant impact on global temperatures is the rising CO2 levels.
Method
Categorical predictor coding (1, 0)
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Regression 2 495729 247865 1262.54 0.000
CO2 level 1 494629 494629 2519.47 0.000
Volcanic 1 1204 1204 6.13 0.014
Error 703 138015 196
Lack-of-Fit 679 136352 201 2.90 0.001
Pure Error 24 1663 69
Total 705 633744
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
14.0115 78.22% 78.16% 78.01%
Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant -326.26 7.11 -45.88 0.000
CO2 level 1.0111 0.0201 50.19 0.000 1.00
Volcanic
1 -9.06 3.66 -2.48 0.014 1.00
Regression Equation
Volcanic
0 Temp = -326.26 + 1.0111 CO2 level
1 Temp = -335.32 + 1.0111 CO2 level