(August 4, 2011 at 3:21 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: You wanted statistics about science (modern science) arising from religion, even if this were possible I am not sure what they'd even look like (x-y scatter plots of the number of people reading Bibles while simultaneously shaking test tubes? Lol).
I didn't even say I wanted statistics. I said massive quoting will only be feasible as "proof" if backed up by something like statistics. What I asked for was an outline leading from religion to the origins of modern science.
(August 4, 2011 at 3:21 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I pointed out that statistics were not used much back then; you made some red herring point about the census.
Not a red herring, dude. I was demonstrating that statistics were used back then and as far back as the earliest civilizations.
(August 4, 2011 at 3:21 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: You really think you are proving your point effectively? That's scary if you really do pseudo-mod.
I don't have a point to make. You do. Call me a pseudo-mod all you want, Stat.