Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 5:18 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
Very short version of the long argument.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Very short version of the long argument.
Mystic Offline
Banned
Religious Views: Shiite Muslim Twelver
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation: 44
#9
RE: Very short version of the long argument.
September 11, 2017 at 8:39 am (This post was last modified: September 11, 2017 at 8:40 am by Mystic.)
(September 11, 2017 at 8:37 am)mh.brewer Wrote:
(September 11, 2017 at 8:35 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Denying the conclusion in an argument is a sign that person has nothing to say regarding the actual argument.

Your first premise was crap and not a basis for an argument/proof.

So we can know something about ultimate goodness (whatever it is) without a connection to it?
(September 11, 2017 at 8:39 am)bennyboy Wrote: Goodness is NOT in fact a property of things, except in our subjective evaluations of them.  To know goodness, know yourself. 

Sir, I see a contradiction between the 1st sentence and the 2nd. Do I need to elaborate?
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
Very short version of the long argument.

Messages In This Thread
Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:17 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Alex K - September 11, 2017 at 8:25 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:32 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Alex K - September 11, 2017 at 10:05 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 8:33 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:35 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 8:37 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:39 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 8:47 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by bennyboy - September 11, 2017 at 12:21 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 12, 2017 at 2:19 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 12, 2017 at 6:54 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 12, 2017 at 7:40 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 12, 2017 at 9:29 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 13, 2017 at 7:48 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Astreja - September 11, 2017 at 3:21 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by bennyboy - September 11, 2017 at 8:39 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Athene - September 11, 2017 at 8:44 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:45 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Athene - September 11, 2017 at 8:52 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:02 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Athene - September 11, 2017 at 9:15 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:20 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:22 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:29 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 8:47 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by brewer - September 11, 2017 at 9:03 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 12:39 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:24 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:40 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 9:26 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:48 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 11, 2017 at 9:51 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 11, 2017 at 9:52 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 9:53 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 11, 2017 at 10:07 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Minimalist - September 11, 2017 at 12:32 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 11, 2017 at 1:53 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Succubus - September 11, 2017 at 2:24 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Astonished - September 12, 2017 at 1:14 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Minimalist - September 12, 2017 at 1:49 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 13, 2017 at 2:36 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Crossless2.0 - September 14, 2017 at 11:33 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 15, 2017 at 12:57 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by ignoramus - September 12, 2017 at 7:58 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by MysticKnight - September 12, 2017 at 8:11 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 8:53 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Astreja - September 13, 2017 at 8:59 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 9:43 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Whateverist - September 13, 2017 at 12:11 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 12:51 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 13, 2017 at 12:54 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 1:11 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 13, 2017 at 1:41 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by WinterHold - September 13, 2017 at 1:50 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Cyberman - September 13, 2017 at 3:08 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by The Valkyrie - September 13, 2017 at 3:44 pm
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by Edwardo Piet - September 14, 2017 at 8:34 am
RE: Very short version of the long argument. - by LadyForCamus - September 14, 2017 at 10:28 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why the vision argument is a very good one! Mystic 72 9802 April 22, 2018 at 12:11 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  (LONG) "I Don't Know" as a Good Answer in Ethics vulcanlogician 69 11553 November 27, 2017 at 1:10 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  A good argument for God's existence (long but worth it) Mystic 179 38014 October 26, 2017 at 1:51 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  Short essay on dualism, idealism, & materialism as concerns Q: What is a table? Mudhammam 28 5635 February 27, 2017 at 3:02 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Question How does one respond to this argument?It's long but an interesting read. Thanks :) fruyian 44 8296 May 19, 2016 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: SteveII
  Trolley problem: 2035 version JuliaL 11 2774 May 27, 2015 at 9:00 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Long term Nihilists CapnAwesome 41 8247 April 26, 2015 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Hatshepsut
  Science: A Religion? (long post) ManMachine 42 7034 September 15, 2014 at 10:52 am
Last Post: Chas
Lightbulb Pascal's Wager (the new version) Muslim Scholar 153 42061 March 12, 2013 at 1:27 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  life is too short for me ! Memz 63 22954 April 26, 2012 at 3:36 am
Last Post: simplexity



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)