RE: Very short version of the long argument.
September 11, 2017 at 9:40 am
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2017 at 9:44 am by Mystic.)
(September 11, 2017 at 9:24 am)Cyberman Wrote: MK, let me ask you - are any of these arguments the basis of what convinced you to be a theist? Because if not, why are we talking about them?
They are, if you recall, the thread about human value and evolution, I questioned the very basis of what makes us human, the very foundations were shaken, and that shaking lead me to an identity crisis, but in that crisis, all these truths became apparent to me.
(September 11, 2017 at 9:29 am)Cyberman Wrote:(September 11, 2017 at 9:22 am)MysticKnight Wrote: It is your fault, exactly. It is bollocks to you because you cannot handle the truth and the path it calls to.
No, it's bollocks because you refuse to support any of your assertions. Yet we're the ones to blame for your being such a lousy teacher? Take a good long look at yourself in a mirror and ask yourself why your approach isn't working.
I elaborate on them, people say too long. I make it short, and people want elaboration. There is no pleasing you guys. I support them in length and people are like o man he has to write so much. I make it short and people are like, where is the elaboration to support.
Really...like really...come on dude. I do both. Long supports and short. Short is to show the argument is very simple. Long to show all the premises are supported.
