(September 11, 2017 at 2:08 pm)SteveII Wrote:(September 11, 2017 at 1:56 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote: I've never seen any evidence that provides consistent support for the central arguments of Christianity (that a god exists as well as those beliefs that require a god to exist). It would be special pleading to "accept" something as evidence of Christianity if comparable "evidence" isn't also accepted as evidence of any other religious and/or god claim.
You have never "seen" or you do not find the information (I use this word to clear up any confusion) we have compelling? There is a huge difference in meaning. You might be unaware of the information we have or you might understand what we have and don't think it's compelling or proof for the existence of God.
Give an example of this "comparable evidence" from another religion.
I have never seen any evidence or information that provides any substantive evidence that corroborates the claims central to Christianity.
The comparable arguments that are given as evidence (but are not) would be things like the ontological argument. If it can be used to "prove" any other god claim, then it does not prove any god.